The data presented in a recent NPD Group/NARM study found terrestrial radio and syndicated television among the main influential sources of music discovery (60% and 49% respectively). With all the new avenues for music discovery out there, why are the majority of people still choosing to shape their musical tastes through premeditated and controlled media sources?
By assessing the data, it leads one to believe that the majority of music consumers are not taking full advantage of this new media age we live in. Personalized services like Pandora and other social-based discovery outlets, allow us to find music we'll enjoy based on how it will cater to our unique individual tastes, as opposed to what we're told we'll like via the mainstream and Clear Channel controlled radio, or through mass television.
If terrestrial radio and passive television still sit atop the music discovery food chain, does this must mean that people haven't quite caught on to the ease and usefulness of personalized music discovery, or are they just lazy and don't want to go through the trouble of shifting their paradigms?
The study used the term “active" music fan—which seems to mean anyone who goes out of their way beyond just passive media to find the music they think they'll enjoy. This again leads one to believe that the majority of the population must be passive music fans. The study also found that online radio and web videos were the top ways that “active" music fans discovered new music. Both of these occur outside the conventional means of passive media consumption, and while they require a little more effort, their rewards are much more intrinsically valuable to the listener.
These days, we have more of a choice than ever to opt out of passive media recommendations, yet the majority of us continually choose to accept them. Perhaps once we better integrate personalized music discovery and consumption into the places where it already happens most passively (the car, the living room, etc), “active" may become the new “passive" and our paradigms will again shift.
By assessing the data, it leads one to believe that the majority of music consumers are not taking full advantage of this new media age we live in. Personalized services like Pandora and other social-based discovery outlets, allow us to find music we'll enjoy based on how it will cater to our unique individual tastes, as opposed to what we're told we'll like via the mainstream and Clear Channel controlled radio, or through mass television.
If terrestrial radio and passive television still sit atop the music discovery food chain, does this must mean that people haven't quite caught on to the ease and usefulness of personalized music discovery, or are they just lazy and don't want to go through the trouble of shifting their paradigms?
The study used the term “active" music fan—which seems to mean anyone who goes out of their way beyond just passive media to find the music they think they'll enjoy. This again leads one to believe that the majority of the population must be passive music fans. The study also found that online radio and web videos were the top ways that “active" music fans discovered new music. Both of these occur outside the conventional means of passive media consumption, and while they require a little more effort, their rewards are much more intrinsically valuable to the listener.
These days, we have more of a choice than ever to opt out of passive media recommendations, yet the majority of us continually choose to accept them. Perhaps once we better integrate personalized music discovery and consumption into the places where it already happens most passively (the car, the living room, etc), “active" may become the new “passive" and our paradigms will again shift.
