Philosophy warms to jazz, but not as much, perhaps, to rock or blues. We can talk through the night about rock and blues, and it may be fun. But just how philosophical can we get about rock and blueseven with the help of a few smart friends and a few adult beverages? Rock is the rambunctious and electrified child that came out of the blues, and the blues are a way to make pain bearable and even enjoyable, once the music does its magic on us. But jazz seems to be more amenable to reflection. It swings; it improvises; it mystifies even as it mesmerizes; its initiates are few, but militant; it is vibrant, but sometimes elusive. It seems that the best rock drummers draw heavily on jazz: Ginger Baker (Cream) and Mitch Mitchell (Jimi Hendrix), making their time keeping more fascinating. (Let's not bring up John Bonham.)
Philosophy is the discipline of finding meaning and truth through reasoning. It aspires to find the essence in the messes of things and to thrust that essence in our face saying, "So what?"as did Miles Davis
on Kind of Blue.
"What is justice?" asked Socrates, when everyone knewbut no one really knewthe answer. "What is jazz?" is much the same: we all know, but do we know? The great philosophers lived and died without swinging (as far as we know). Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine, may have written about music, but not jazz music. That would have to wait for centuries. Jazz had a centuries long gestation.
Like many things, we may come to jazz without articulated intellectual questions. We are not usually in the classroom, but at the club, or auditorium, or sitting in front of our sound system. We listen and are moved. Or not. That is, we feel an immediate response, whatever that may be. Pat Metheny
's response was love at first listen. He did not have to work his way into jazz. It found him. In my late teens, I was drawn to jazz-rock fusion, but still only picked up the crumbs from the dinner plates of jazz. It boggles my mind to think that I had a vinyl album of A Love Supreme,
in my senior year of high schoolalong with my Deep Purple, Yes, and Jimi Hendrix. But I seldom played it. It was beyond me at the time, but not beneath me. It had to wait for me to catch upand I did.
Since then this philosopher has come to savor this music, a distinctively American art form (but not limited to America). But what is philosophical about jazz? Yes, some jazz men are philosophical: John Coltrane
supremely so. But that is not all I mean.
Like philosophy, jazz summons us to attend carefully to itself. Just as you shouldn't read philosophy in a hurry, you shouldn't listen to jazz casuallythat is, if you want to find the center and get immersed in the vibe. It draws you in and keeps you there. Is the singer a little behind the beat? Did Charlie Haden
play the same note through several choruses on the recording, Last Dance
with Keith Jarrett
? It seemed odd, but fit perfectly. Of course it did. It was Charlie Haden.
Further, Aristotle wrote that "Philosophy begins in wonder." I wonder over and ponder the relation of the mind and the body, the relation of God to the world, the relation of unity and diversity (to be more abstract). When I introducedPat Martino
at Dazzle recently, I quoted Aristotle and added, "Many of us wonder how Pat can play like that." Pat tells me that his playing is "pure emotion" and comes from a higher source. On the same note, many of us wonder over the emotion and aspirations flaming out of John Coltrane's musicparticularly A Love Supreme.
Music comes from musicians and their instruments. But is that all there is to it? Does the structure of music exist apart from its performance? Eric Dolphy
was recorded as saying that the music flies off into space and is no more. Was he right, or is that music retained in some sacred vault beyond our memories or recordings?
Like any philosopher, I could go on, but this is an essay (a short solo), not a book. Perhaps that book needs to be written. However, I will go on listening philosophically to this philosophical music: jazz. Please join me in this performance.