So... the awards season is over. From the Golden Globes to the Grammys, the Winter Olympics to the Oscars, it's been a long and winding road.
Among people competing for the various honors and annual awards, one of the more popular topics of conversation was: OK, let's say I am the winnerwhat then? Good question.
Of those who believed they deserve the recognition (which is all of them) only those who had previously received one of the honors knew that the little statue at the top of the mountain doesn't really hold more career opportunities, more money, more love or better sleep at night. But it's okay, because the real payoff is something more valuable than all those things: the admiration of your peers. After a lifetime of being ignored, denied, rejected, underpaid and invalidated, to have your hard work acknowledged at last means that you can go back to liking yourself again.
But some odd things can happen at the top of the mountain. Celebrity, for example, when the artist becomes the object of that admiration, instead of the art.
The nominees for Record of the Year at the 17th Annual Grammys ceremony held on March 1, 1975, were:
Elton JohnDon't Let the Sun Go Down on Me
Roberta FlackFeel Like Making Love
Joni MitchellHelp Me
Olivia Newton-JohnI Honestly Love You
Maria MuldaurMidnight at the Oasis
Of the five nominees, only one of the songs failed to survive the 1970s. Four of the five got admitted to the big circus tent of "classic rock," which by now includes nearly any popular music (aside from gutbucket blues or straight-ahead jazz) written in 2/2, 2/4, 4/4 or 6/8 between 1955 and 2005, from jump blues to rockabilly to soul to R&B to rock & roll to folk rock to hard rock to progressive rock to grunge to whatever you call what Beck does. It includes every related musical formfrom the sharpest on the edges to the smoothest in the middleonce played on AM and FM radio stations and now on their internet equivalents.
Perversely, it was that very song that history has left behind which actually won the top Grammy honors in 1975 for Record of the Year. It was the sort of marshmallow-soft confection that no one ever seems to want to claim association with in retrospect. Call it pop, short for "popular," or pop as in the sound bubblegum makes when it deflates on contact with anything solid or pointed.
Throughout the snarky improvised shtick during their 1975 presentation, John Lennon and Paul Simon heap the sarcasm and inside jokes on one and all as they read bits of forced cleverness from the cue cards. Seen through the filter of our current age's obsequious political correctness, their unscripted cynicism and snideness about the evening's proceedings can be difficult to read.
More difficult still when Lennon finally announces that "I Honestly Love You" is the winner, followed by Art Garfunkel inexplicably coming out of the audience to accept the Record of the Year Grammy for Newton-John and her producer, John Farrar. The scene feels so surreal that even Fellini would have asked for a re-write if he'd been directing the show (see backstage photo at top of first page l. to r.: David Bowie; Art Garfunkel, holding one of the Grammys awarded to Newton- John and Farrar; Paul Simon, holding the other; Yoko Ono; John Lennon; and Roberta Flack ... it couldn't have been odder if May Pang had joined them).
It was a meeting of the Sgt. Pepper's No Love Lost Lonely Hearts Club. Garfunkel and Simon had unhappily split up an act they formed in high school, just months after releasing their Bridge Over Troubled Water
, for which they eventually accepted six Grammys and sold 25 million copies (by far their most successful album).
In the same year as that notorious dissolution, 1970, John Lennon had of course sundered his famous relationship with his mates Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr, even less amicably. And four months after bidding adieu
, the most artistically and commercially successful band in history posthumously released one of their
most successful albums, Let It Be
. Learning to Let It Be
On the same day when that final Beatles album hit the streets, a documentary film of the same title was released. Produced by Apple, directed by Michael Lindsay-Hogg and filmed throughout most of January in 1969, it captures the agonies and ecstasies, the realities and unrealities, and the essential tedium of making a sound recording, warts and all. It is probably the first time anyone had ever attempted to make such a document, and it succeeded so brilliantly that no one is ever likely to do it again.
In addition to the expected scenes of songwriting, jamming, rehearsing, improvising, arguing and clowning, the filmgoer is shown the grind of the long, long hours, the ill tempers, the artistic labyrinths, the endless cigarettes and cups of tea. We get to see the dynamics of a real-live, old-fashioned working band: four people who had ridden in the back of a van along with their equipment, stacked on top of each other like cordwood in order to keep warm on the trip to Hamburg; four people who had eaten, lived and breathed the music together, non-stop, for ten years. And we are afforded the rare opportunity of peering under the surface at many of the qualities that defined the Beatles, the most uniquely gifted musicians of their generation, and how they produced music in the studio.
Paul McCartney and his charismatic personality had provided the de facto
leadership of the band since manager Brian Epstein's death in 1967. Despite Epstein's strong presence and skilled management, despite the respect he commanded from all four of the Beatles, despite his intention to overcome the growing security issues and PA system difficulties, he had failed to get them to perform live for nearly a year. Indeed, after his sudden death from a drug overdose, the boys were inclined to hang it up altogether. So from that day forward, McCartney cajoled and wheedled them into carrying on, kept them moving forward one day at a time. His often pedantic approach is on full display in the film, as well as Lennon's loyal, vocal opposition and Harrison's introversion in the long shadows that those two cast, plus Starr's somewhat detached but rock-steady presence in the corner.
It was no bed of roses. Camera-shy George Harrison wanted to get rid of the cameras and forgo the whole idea of doing a film. Family man Paul McCartney slightly breached the musician's creed of protected isolation at the recording studio by having his wife and daughter drop by, probably in response to Lennon's flagrant breach of letting Yoko Ono settle down next to him as though she were a participant in the session. Ringo looks alternately disgusted and stoically resigned to it all. And for the first time a guest artist, in the person of Billy Preston, was publicly employed as a participant in a Beatles recording session, though many others had done so anonymously over the years.
Lindsay-Hogg cut out much that deserved expurgation and even more at the Beatles' request, including footage of a short period during which Harrison resigned from the band and the others discussed who to replace him with. But the band had been unraveling for some time even happy-go-lucky Ringo had quit the band for a while the year before; Lennon would tell the others of his decision to leave the band later in September, after which McCartney would retreat to a home studio and begin quietly recording a solo album.
A few scenes that remain in the film are certainly unpleasant for the way they remind the surviving participants that those final days as a band were difficult at times. But as usual, despite all the drama and chaos, the band was as creatively engaged and exacting in their approach as ever. Lennon's later claimsthat the studio tapes' substandard quality was the reason he had hired Phil Spector to do extensive post-production work on what Glyn Johns and Alan Parsons had recorded could well be true, but from start to finish, everything in the film, from the rehearsals to those last live tunes filmed and recorded on the roof of the Abbey Road studios, documented a masterful chapter in their superb artistry. Through it all, despite drugs and disillusionment and every form of legal thievery and managerial interference known to man, they continued to set the professional standards every musician has been measured against since.
It was quite appropriate that the Beatles then received the Academy Award for Best Original Score for a Motion Picture for the outstanding music they had made for Let It Be
. It was a fitting accompaniment to the Grammy they had received for Best Original Score for a Motion Picture a month earlier.
But you would never guess it, not based on the way the Beatles responded to the honors. Note the film clip here from that Grammys ceremony, an earlier Fellini-esque time capsule that captures the moment when a sneaker-shod Paul McCartney, plus wife Linda, minus Lennon and Harrison, accepts the award from... can it be?...
When a casually dressed McCartney and his wife come bounding out of the audience to accept the three Grammys from Wayne, Sir Paul takes one of the heavy little statuettes, has Linda take one, and jokingly offers the third to John Wayne. Clearly nervous and uncomfortable with the situation, he offers only a four-word speech to all his admirers in the audience. "Thank you, good night," he says, and gets off the stage quickly. Live And Let Die
The reason McCartney had showed up is because throughout it all he had always maintained a British sense of decorum and protocol. In his mind, an English gentleman doesn't win a Grammy and then just not show up to receive it. In many ways the film had been his project all along, as many things had been since 1967. But the album that had come from it was certainly a collaborative effort, all the post-production wrangling notwithstanding.
McCartney's sense of the Beatles' place in history meant he was quite aware that during the months since the album's and film's release, both were quickly being labeled a chronicle of the Beatles' final recording sessions and break-up. Never mind that it wasn't. It was actually the recording they began later in February, after finishing with the Let It Be
sessions, and continued producing through August, that was the last the Beatles did together. George Martin returned as the producer on the condition that he be allowed to control the proceedings as he had on Sgt. Pepper's
, resulting in a disciplined session approach and more congenial atmosphere. Lennon and McCartney held the it together despite some disagreements on what material to do and how to do it, and Yoko was still a fixture, but the sublime Abbey Road
was the result. Shortly after wrapping up an acknowledged masterpiece, Lennon announced he wanted a "divorce" from the Beatles. Abbey Road
was mixed quickly and released in September, 1969, but because of the involved post-production difficulties with Let It Be
, both the album and film were delayed and not released until the following May, several months after the lawyers had taken over and the Beatles' "divorce" proceedings had begun. The stigma resulting from that coincidence of timing stuck.
The backbiting and nastiness visited by a community upon anyone who is thought to have deserted them is one of the primordial elements of social change. The Beatles were feeling the wrath of a fan base scorned. While many music critics were dismissing the recording as a poor effort, fans the world over were forming a lasting distrust of the inscrutably quiet, black-clad Yoko Ono. Her ubiquitous presence in the film quickly got her labeled as the agent provocateur
responsible for the band's demise.
The following year, McCartney did just what he should have done in going to Los Angeles to accept the Academy Award. From Lennon's and Harrison's recent cathartic musical statements, it was pretty certain they wouldn't be attending. Who knows what Ringo was thinking? Above all, McCartney knew, more than anyone outside the band ever could, the close relationship he and his friends had shared and the consequent anguish their recent separation meant. He fetched the Grammy for all of them.
Did the award make the difference or turn the tide of public sentiment? Let It Be
eventually went on to become one of the Beatles' best-selling albums, so the music has certainly endured. But you haven't been able to buy a copy of that Academy Award-winning film since it went out of print in the early 1980s. If you're lucky and can find a used VHS copy on eBay, you'll pay a lot to own it. More than likely, you'll pay a lot for a crappy bootleg copy of a copy.
It's been out of print because the film's reputation as the chronicle of rancor and dissension that caused their breakup has continued to grow unabated. The irony now
, of course, is that people continue to accept this fuzzy fiction to be true largely because they can't actually view the film and discover how incorrect the perception is. Instead, it should have become known as the classic cinéma vérité
that it is, with a killer last reel consisting of the band plus guest keyboardist Billy Preston performing their classic material live"Get Back," "Don't Let Me Down," "I've Got A Feeling," "One After 909" and "Dig A Pony."
Always sensitive to the reputation and legacy of the Beatles' catalog, McCartney and Starr, plus surviving heirs Olivia Harrison and Yoko Ono, still view the film as having more negative than positive impact, and have never agreed to reprint it in any form. One or more of them feel that maintaining the whimsical Hard Day's Night
version of the band's image somehow serves the music's place in history better than Let It Be
. But the longer it has stayed out of print, the more complex people's lives have become. The longer it goes on, the harder it will be to change that consensusexcept of course, when the tide finally turns, and the cautiously redacted, sugar-coated illusions-as-biography dissolve in a vinegary fizz. As internet content balloons in this information age, the best way to deal with the inevitable disinformation attendant to PR and image-shaping is to tell the truth. Even when the truth stings a bit as people discover the dirty little secrets of their hero(s), we move on. We ultimately forgive anything, and always will, as long as it isn't kept secret any longer or dispensed as half-truths. The only thing that ever stands in the way of redemption is what is hidden and undisclosed, because the truth of the transgression is never as bad as it seems in the mind of the transgressor. So what if George went off in a pouty snit and refused to talk for a few days? Who among us hasn't? Director Michael Lindsay-Hogg said in 2011 that there was a chance a DVD might be released in 2013. As of this date it hasn't happened, but that doesn't mean it never could. One can hope.
The Competitive Edge
Competitors in any field are always looking for an advantage, something they can utilize to increase the odds of success. A clever wax specialist can help a skier beat everyone to the finish line and win a medal on the same day that the leading contender has been slowed slightly with an injury. For a recording artist, a golden-eared producer can mean the difference in creating a sound that turns a great song into a dance hit, the same way a cutting-edge special effects wizard can turn a well scripted movie into box office gold.
Many desperate competitors believe that loud self-promotion sways minds and wins the day. Others would have you believe that the biggest competitive advantage is a weak field. Both beliefs contain a few grains of truth, but are almost entirely wrong. Promotion succeeds only to the extent the promoter can reach a target audience and then deliver on a promise. And only a strong field can make a good competitor perform better or look better by comparison, by challenging him to rise to the occasion.
The single biggest advantage a competitor has (all things being equal, which they very often arewhether in the subjectively judged world of the arts or in the fanatically measured world of sports, where .004 seconds on a luge run can mean the difference between fame and infamy, or worse, anonymity) is to not only be better or do better work than anyone else in the field, but to not be taken seriously by anyone else in the field until that critical moment when it is too late to fend him off. Every racer knows that the ideal place in a race is in the blind spot of the oddsmakers' favorite pick to win it, drafting the presumptive winner. It's the place where the spotlight isn't. (See above, re: 1975 Record of the Year Grammyhow else would Olivia Newton-John have beaten out Joni Mitchell or Roberta Flack?)
That moment, when you step out of the shade of the mountain and suddenly make the final climb to its summit, is the most deliciously advantageous position of all. A great artist or athlete seldom gets to experience it more than once. The irony is that after that first taste, attempts by the once victorious at every competition thereafter, to defy nature and get that advantage one more time, are doomed. It is all downhill from the top of the mountain.
And nowhere are those odd contradictions and vicissitudes of celebrity more apparent than in the most seriously cutthroat competitions of allthe awards businessthat vortex of desperate vyings for the position at center stage where all the adulation of one's fans and peers swirls the most deliriously. And In the End, the Love You Take Is Equal to the Love You Make
Which brings us back to those bizarre four minutes of video with Paul Simon and John Lennon at the 1975 Grammys. It took a while to get here, but these two artists' stories are what their dismissive jokes and jibes are all about. Both had climbed to the tops of their respective mountains. Both had been repeatedly acknowledged by their peers. Both had fans numbering in the millions (maybe billions in the case of the Beatlesthey probably were
more popular than Jesus Christ at one point, but as Lennon had indicated, he never said that it was a good thing). Both had held armfuls of gold statues in recognition of their accomplishments, songs which people will listen to and sing again and again, until the end of time. Both had bank accounts stuffed with money.
What ain't we got (as Ray Walston sang in South Pacific
)? Hint: the answer is not "babes." Neither of them had a shortage of babes.
What neither John Lennon nor Paul Simon had enough of at that moment was other mountains to climb. Certainly, they had other interests, but art for an artist is an activity, not a statue or a badge. The worst pain an artist can experience is a shortage of that activity. If he (or she) has an artistic collaborator, a divorce or even a separation from that collaborator is the bitterest possible pill to swallow. Fellow artists, particularly fellow collaborators, are the most valuable friends (and assets) an artist has. Being able to challenge yourself and keep going with your next artistic venture is the most revitalizing, energizing activity there is. Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow
Many years ago I watched Charlie Rose interview Kenneth Branagh, the fine actor best known for his Shakespearean acting and directing. He's been nominated many times, but has never won an Academy Award or a Golden Globe. He had just completed writing and directing a film, A Midwinter's Tale
as I recall, and was describing the experience when Rose asked him why, after his recent success in films like Dead Again
and Much Ado About Nothing
, he was directing a small art film (shot in black and white, no less).
Branagh said he considered it a privilege to do his newly finished filmthe darkly comical story of an out-of-work actor's quest for redemption by producing a play that raises money to save his sister's church from land developersbecause in his mind, the definition of success is having the freedom to choose what he will do next. Money, recognition and fame, he said, simply provide the wherewithal to accomplish his artistic goals.
In one of Branagh's favorite roles, when Shakespeare's words for the tragic Danish prince offer that "tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow" are just brief candles to be blown out too quickly, and the depiction of the stories of these days an idiot's work "full of sound and fury signifying nothing," the Bard is having Hamlet utter precisely what the author believed was the downfall and death of any man or artist: the belief that there are no more mountains to climb. Whether it is "success" or "failure" that brings an artist to this terrible conclusion, matters not. Whether the artist literally ends her life in "failure" like Sylvia Plath, or after "success" retires to a New Hampshire cabin like J.D. Salinger, matters not. It is the pathological end of the line for an artist.
Supporting the arts is the ultimate expression of enlightened self-interest, and it really just boils down to supporting artists who are oriented toward the another mountain. When you do it you get another of Monet's paintings, another of Chopin's sonatas, or another of Shakespeare's plays in your life. Whether he or she has a mantle bedecked with shiny awards or one adorned with candles lit instead of cursing the darkness, going out of your way to acknowledge the work he does for the world helps keep him doing whatever is his next project. It's what he lives for, whether he's John Lennon or your friend from high school.
Whether he has chosen to be a tailor in Kiev, a painter in Paris, a novelist in Seattle, a cabinetmaker in London, or a songwriter in NYC, support him. You are what he lives for, too. Photo credits
Page 1, courtesy of morrisonhotelgallery.com
Page 4, courtesy of beatlesbible.com