Quantcast
NEWS |
Return to home page





Room 13
Yair Loewenson Trio
Folk Songs for Jazzers
Frank Macchia
Freefall
The Chuck Anderson Trio
Another Night in London
Gene Harris
Here In the Moment
Gail Pettis
Simpatico
Claudio Roditi



Trio Reenactment
Info | Enter
Dave King
Info | Enter
Frank Macchia
Info | Enter
Kurt Rosenwinkel
Info | Enter




Live Reviews | Published: April 22, 2009

Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present Tense - World Premiere


By Eric Benson
Discuss (2)    

[1] 2 | Next Page

Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present Tense
World Premiere
The Allen Room at Jazz at Lincoln Center
New York, NY
April 15, 2009

The Jazz Wars are over. Now what? A new documentary asks.

Since the early 1980s, jazz has been engaged in its own nonviolent, low-intensity civil war. Decentralized and often unrelated bands of avant-gardists, fusionistas, and other dissidents have struggled to defend their territory against the fast encroaching empire of the Young Lions—those hard swinging, neo-traditionalist post-boppers who stormed the scene, gobbled up the money, and wrote their own victor's history. In 1996, when the Lincoln Center Board voted to install Jazz at Lincoln Center as a permanent part of the institution's programming, the Young Lions' victory seemed complete. Five years later, documentarian Ken Burns codified the Young Lions' take on jazz history for the public-television-watching masses: jazz died in the 70s, Wynton Marsalis—the mightiest of all Young Lions—and his minions resurrected it in the 80s, Jazz at Lincoln Center solidified those gains in the 90s, the future of jazz will sound a lot like its past.

In the years since Burns' documentary, however, things haven't gone according to script. The Jazz Wars, it turns out, didn't end with the Young Lions' foundation of the imperial city of Jazz at Lincoln Center, nor did they see the avant-garde launch a massive counteroffensive that deposed King Wynton from his throne. No, the jazz wars have ended with an armistice accord after a series of high profile gestures of peace and reconciliation, from Jazz at Lincoln Center inviting Cecil Taylor and John Zorn to headline Rose Hall to the Bad Plus' Ethan Iverson writing a series of largely laudatory essays on the Young Lions. A consensus may not have emerged yet, but the relationship between the sides has changed from pitched conflict to open debate.

Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present Tense—a new, four-part documentary produced by John Comerford, which premiered its first episode, "A Quiet Revolution," at Jazz at Lincoln Center's Allen Room last Wednesday—focuses on the deceptively simple question that launched a thousand ships: "what is jazz?" Interviewing dozens of musicians on the contemporary scene, the filmmakers craft a mosaic of musings, from old Jazz Warriors Donald Harrison (for the Young Lions) and John Medeski (for Team Other) still sniping at the enemy, to younger players such as drummer Dave King suggesting that the Jazz Wars may have been a critics' invention far more than a musicians' reality.

If there's a common thread tying this vast array of opinions together, it's "J-word" fatigue. During the Jazz Wars, whether you were with Wynton or against him, nothing fired you up like the word "jazz." The Young Lions defined the word with their particular semantic politics and then used it excessively: jazz trumpeter Wynton Marsalis of the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra at Jazz at Lincoln Center. The avant-gardists conceded "jazz" entirely, referring to that thing they played simply as "the music." The end of the Jazz Wars means the "J-word" has lost much of its politically divisive power as both sides seem to have realized that they can't simply define their enemy out of existence.

So if the Jazz Wars have ended on a note of compromise—with the Young Lions opening up their halls of power to the avant-gardists (and mildly contrarian documentary films) and avant-gardists recognizing many of the Young Lions' musical achievements (if not their rhetoric) as beneficial to the art—then what lies ahead for the form and its cultural relevance? No one, it seems, has any idea.

Jazz's great struggle now, Icons Among Us tell us, is not with itself over its identity, but with the outside world over its perceived irrelevance. Pianist Robert Glasper compares Ben Franklin's apocryphal discovery of electricity to Coltrane's modal innovations, asking why electricity has made massive leaps since Franklin but jazz is stuck in Coltrane's giant steps. Dave King asserts that jazz is healthiest when it's part of the cultural conversation: musicians "have to be able to feel like they're contributing," he says. Critic Paul de Barros, serving as a wild-eyed foil to the filmmakers, tells us that, culturally, the current jazz scene "has nothing to say." "We don't know what the connection is between the society and Bill Frisell," De Barros says to underscore his point.


[1] 2 | Next Page

Visit Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present Tense on the web.


Post your comment on:
Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present Tense - World Premiere

Michael Ricci wrote on 2009-04-24 10:37:25:

Posted on behalf of John W. Comerford

Dear Editor,

In response to the article published by your website yesterday evening entitled "Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present Tense" World Premiere by Eric Benson I wanted to share two thoughts of my own as Executive Producer of the film series.

First, and most important is my intention to welcome a dialogue with any interested party in our work. So, with that in mind I invite Mr. Benson to consider one of the core findings of our seven year journey to complete the episodes. At the center of this discovery lies a simple truth, that if we have learned anything from our study of the words and music of these deeply committed artists, it is that jazz is what you make of it. Its subjective properties are the foundation of its meaning and when the listener's emotional and intellectual responses are externalized, jazz has the potential to create a conversation which is filled with both powerful agreement and disagreement.

Second, is the idea that the standards which the writer appears to be judging us by are perhaps inappropriate after a single viewing the first episode of our four part series.

Lastly, if it is a rallying cry the writer seeks then he may be unable to recognize the integrity of our work as we have gone to great lengths to offer only the musicians' words and music to invest in the infinite possibilities of conversation which are at the heart of jazz in my humble opinion.

Yours truly,

John W. Comerford
Executive Producer, Icons Among Us: jazz in the present tense

Lodge a complaint about this post 

Eric Benson wrote on 2009-04-25 10:27:11:

First off, let me thank John Comerford for his thoughtful response to my article. I'm honored that the executive producer of Icons Among Us took the time to address many of the issues that I raised in my article.

I agree with Mr. Comerford's assertion that in jazz's "subjective properties are the foundation of its meaning and when the listener's emotional and intellectual responses are externalized, jazz has the potential to create a conversation which is filled with both powerful agreement and disagreement." We've seen these powerful agreements and disagreements among musicians, among critics, and among fans. It's the stuff that sells a million copies of Rolling Stone every time they throw a "100 greatest ____ of all-time" up on the cover. Interpreting jazz (or any other art) fuels debate, hopefully lively, spirited, and productive.

I certainly have considered the simple truth that "jazz is what you make of it." As a critic for All About Jazz, I'm routinely asked to make something of what I hear, to render an opinion on what worked and what didn't. I have never thought that jazz has only one truth or one definition, but I've also never thought that we should judge every artistic effort equal. It's up to every interpreter, be he or she a musician, writer, filmmaker, or listener to decide what we should pass over and what we should celebrate.

When I wrote, "At the end of the first episode, our picture of ‘jazz in the present tense' is of a music that wants to be current, isn't quite sure how to get there, doesn't quite know what to do with its history, and is beginning to look for something to do beside infighting," I meant to suggest that the music is still in the middle of a process of interpreting itself and its future. John Medeski says as much in Icons Among Us, identifying the current era as an especially exciting time in jazz precisely because everything is unsettled, because no heroic figurehead has yet emerged.

Mr. Comerford took issue with the final sentence of my piece: "That's not much of a rallying cry for a revolution, quiet or otherwise." I don't seek rallying cries normally, but I do from revolutions. My comment criticized what I saw as a disjunction between the episode's content—which painted jazz as a music with a lot of very different opinions on its present, past, and future—and the episode's title, "A Quiet Revolution." The first episode of the documentary did a great job of giving voice to the differences within the jazz world, we saw everyone from Wynton Marsalis to Bugge Wesseltoft. It did not convince me, however, that there was a revolution going on in jazz; it convinced me that jazz was in a period of questioning. The subtitle to my article—"The Jazz Wars are over. Now what?"—reflected this view. The next three episodes may well prove me wrong, but given the first episode's claim of a "quiet revolution," I think my critique was valid.

I'd like to add that I'm eager to view the final three episodes of Icons Among Us and to continue the dialogue that we've begun here.

My warm best,

Eric Benson
Brooklyn, NY

Lodge a complaint about this post 

Signup & post a comment!
Read more comments (2)


Related Video





More articles by Eric Benson

Eric Revis Quartet at the Jazz Gallery: Old-Time...
The Making of Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present...
Brad Mehldau at the Village Vanguard
The Making of Darcy James Argue's "Infernal...
Icons Among Us: Jazz in the Present Tense - World...




More Articles | More Live Reviews

Chris Jentsch: Cycles and Reflecting on the Journey
February 2010
Who Owns Music?
Take Five With Rick Stone
Polar Bear: Raw and Spontaneous





 
(94)




Gene Harris

Sweet Georgia Brown
From Another Night in London

More | Recent | Top









Advertise | Contact Us | Site Map |


All material copyright © 2010 All About Jazz and/or contributing writer/visual artist. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy