All About Jazz

Home » Articles » Opinion


What's Wrong With Today's Live Jazz

Richard Lawn By

Sign in to view read count
What happened to the jazz clubs that would present a band for a week or at least a few consecutive dates?
What's wrong with today's live jazz scene?

There has been a great deal of whining about the climate for live jazz these days. The complaints are sometimes accompanied by speculation about why jazz seems to have slipped off the radar, particularly in many major cities such as Philadelphia. The complaints, however, are often unaccompanied by suggestions about fixing the problems, or any specific theories about why and how things have disintegrated.

Before I go any further in presenting my own analysis of the situation, let me first make several confessions and clarifications. I am a musician—a jazz composer, arranger, educator and bandleader. I am also card-carrying member of AARP and the AFof M. In more youthful days I performed with the likes of Lionel Hampton, Chuck Mangione, Mel Torme, Natalie Cole, Ray Charles, Diane Schuur, and others. While I was born and raised in suburban Philadelphia, I spent 34 years away from the area before returning a little more than a decade ago. Some may therefore argue that I'm an "outsider" to the local jazz scene, a relative newcomer whose observations aren't well informed.

I am grateful for the few gigs I get with my band, so don't get me wrong, but my observations may be perceived as sour grapes for not getting more gigs. I assure you that is not the case, if for no other reason than as a "senior citizen" who is retired from his day job I don't care to be working in clubs five nights a week (though I wouldn't mind a few more than I currently enjoy).

My observations and concerns are not directed merely at the Philly scene, as I think they are also appropriate to many other cities where one might find jazz including Austin, Texas, the self proclaimed "Live Music Capital of the World." I spent 21 years living and working in that city, so I'm well versed in that music scene up until about 10 years ago. I continue to maintain communications with Austin jazz musicians.

I have set the table framing my opinions with personal background, context, and possible biases. I'm going to tell you one of the specific problems that lies at the core of the jazz malaise, and some possible solutions. It is important to understand that this malaise affects both musicians and audiences for jazz.

My wife and I recently returned from a short visit to NYC, after soaking in some amazing live jazz. What I'm about to identify as a significant problem was reinforced by this trip to the city that continues to be the epicenter of jazz, and the problem I'm about to focus on is not so prevalent there.

What happened to jazz clubs that would present a band for a week or at least a few consecutive dates? In days gone by this was common practice in many, many cities such as Philadelphia. Fans had multiple nights to catch a group's performance, and for that matter, a band had the opportunity to develop a fan base since they could be heard over the course of many nights at a single club or even multiple clubs. Their residencies might even move from one club to another. Consecutive performances are an important factor in helping a band to develop its sound, a musical DNA that over time is what generates a fan base. You can still encounter such opportunities in NYC, but they have disappeared in most other cities.

If a band does not have the opportunity for multiple consecutive performances, how is this important group sound and concept to coalesce? Are musicians supposed to rehearse for hours and hours in someone's basement or garage in order to develop a special musical style? Rehearsing is an important part of the process, of course, but at some point the music must be shared with an audience for feedback, encouragement, or even criticism. After a point, practicing also doesn't pay the bills. Whether for economic reasons, or simply management whims, the opportunities for more regular employment are becoming more scarce, if not obsolete. What bands typically get now is what might be termed showcases—one night a month if they are lucky.


comments powered by Disqus

Related Articles

Read Trumpet Miming in Film: Mostly Jive Opinion
Trumpet Miming in Film: Mostly Jive
by Steve Provizer
Published: June 23, 2017
Read NEA Dismantling: Let's Do The Time Warp Again Opinion
NEA Dismantling: Let's Do The Time Warp Again
by Homer Jackson
Published: April 12, 2017
Read Chuck Berry: 1926-2017 Opinion
Chuck Berry: 1926-2017
by C. Michael Bailey
Published: March 21, 2017
Read New York Times Downsizes Jazz Coverage: A Response Opinion
New York Times Downsizes Jazz Coverage: A Response
by Victor L. Schermer
Published: March 7, 2017
Read Hentoff helped pave way for jazz journalism’s acceptance Opinion
Hentoff helped pave way for jazz journalism’s...
by Jim Trageser
Published: January 12, 2017
Read A giant of jazz journalism silenced Opinion
A giant of jazz journalism silenced
by Jim Trageser
Published: January 8, 2017
Read "Chuck Berry: 1926-2017" Opinion Chuck Berry: 1926-2017
by C. Michael Bailey
Published: March 21, 2017
Read "Pittsburgh Jazz: A Brief History" History of Jazz Pittsburgh Jazz: A Brief History
by Steve Rowland
Published: June 14, 2017
Read "Presenting Problem" The Big Question Presenting Problem
by Duncan Heining
Published: January 30, 2018
Read "Wadada Leo Smith At Firehouse 12" Live Reviews Wadada Leo Smith At Firehouse 12
by Franz A. Matzner
Published: May 11, 2017
Read "Cloudland Re-Revisited: Think of One" Genius Guide to Jazz Cloudland Re-Revisited: Think of One
by Jeff Fitzgerald, Genius
Published: April 7, 2017
Read "Jazzkaar 2017" Live Reviews Jazzkaar 2017
by Martin Longley
Published: May 29, 2017
Read "Duos – Patrice Williamson/Jon Wheatley; Bill Brovold/Jamie Saft; Randy Ingram/Drew Gress; Eraldo Bernocchi/Prakash Sontakke; Cathy Segal-Garcia" Bailey's Bundles Duos – Patrice Williamson/Jon Wheatley; Bill...
by C. Michael Bailey
Published: April 28, 2017