7

The Many Faces of Jazz Today: The Big Picture

Victor L. Schermer By

Sign in to view read count
I think this is a very open definition that reflects the time in which we live. It is receptive to all possibilities, but it allows us to raise eyebrows when the music does not contain the essence of jazz. Then we can say, "That's interesting, but it doesn't affect me in the way that great jazz does." It sets flexible but clear boundaries and objectives for the musician. It's a way of giving some coherence during a time of incredible openness and even chaos in music. The musician can step outside the boundary if he wants to, but has to acknowledge what he is doing. And critics must do the same. It's not confining the music in any way. It's simply a way of encouraging honesty. The best musicians know this is important. For example, Rudresh Mahanthappa and Vijay Iyer have focused on improvisations that are based in their musical heritage from India. But their immersion in the jazz idiom as defined above is always manifest. That is because both of them fully mastered the Afro-American jazz tradition before bringing in the Carnatic and other musical expressions of India.

On this basis, I think we can say that jazz is alive and well in its various traditional and innovative formats, i.e. that jazz is not, as some argue, dead, passé, or a museum piece. The Big Picture is truly a remarkable phenomenon, and it is exciting to look at the great expansion of ideas and countries that make jazz "what it is" today, and what dynamics foster or hinder its continued emphasis on originality, individuality, and the power to move and transform audiences. I will discuss three of these developments: the globalization and digitalization of jazz; the business aspect of producing the music; and jazz education. Then I will have a few brief suggestions about how we who love jazz can exercise a positive influence and take constructive action.

The Globalization and Digitalization of Jazz in the Postmodern Era

By the 1930s, jazz migrated geographically from New Orleans to the midwest and Chicago to coast-to-coast. Soon, it quickly caught on in Western Europe. After WWII, it became popular in the Caribbean, South and Central America, and Japan. Since the 1960s, it has expanded around the world. Today, jazz appeals to people on all continents, even in remote villages and outposts. An Eskimo or a Trobriand Islander might have some jazz records, and might even form a band. It's easy to assume that the music America exports will remain in its original form, like Wisconsin cheese or a Dell computer. But because it is improvised, jazz quickly morphs to reflect the culture of a particular region. By definition, you can't "copy" jazz. You're going to play it the way you experience it. And someone is going to come to your town, love what you play, and bring it back to Paris or Kalamazoo. Not too long ago, I heard the wonderful Danish singer Sinne Eeg at a club in Philadelphia. She had the American vocalist tradition in the bag, but it still felt like being at a club in Denmark, which has its own jazz legacy. Her American sidemen were picking up on her every nuance, and you can bet it had an influence on them. Jazz is an infectious art form. It has become a truly amazing tapestry of everything imaginable from everywhere. If we can believe Sun Ra, it even came from outer space! (LOL!) If Mars gets colonized, we will undoubtedly hear "red planet" jazz.

The point that needs to be made to the traditionalists is that the jazz legacy has changed forever to reflect this global influence. It has a new legacy embodying all the peoples of the world. That is why Steve Coleman received a McArthur grant to study the music of African countries. That is partly why Pat Martino plays with the concentration of a Japanese Zen master. That is why an Italian composer Bruno Martino could write the Brazilian jazz standard, "Estaté." International diversity has made jazz more beautiful and inspiring than it has ever been. The true home of jazz today is not New Orleans but Earth! When the dust settles on all this, jazz will sound very different than it does now. Yet, in my opinion, it will still possess the features of Afro-American jazz that I delineated above.

Globalization is changing the face of jazz every day, mostly in a good way. The one danger I sense is that some players superimpose their national idiom on jazz rather than forming a chemical bond. But such "colonization" is not so much a worry for me as what digitalization, the Internet, and postmodernism might do to the music. Here is why I am concerned.

Tags

comments powered by Disqus

More Articles

Read The Many Faces of Jazz Today: The Big Picture What is Jazz? The Many Faces of Jazz Today: The Big Picture
by Victor L. Schermer
Published: November 10, 2017
Read Jazz and Philosophy What is Jazz? Jazz and Philosophy
by Douglas Groothuis
Published: October 15, 2017
Read In Praise of Young Jazz Musicians What is Jazz? In Praise of Young Jazz Musicians
by Steve Provizer
Published: September 30, 2017
Read Tokyo Jazz Joints: Capturing An Old Love Story What is Jazz? Tokyo Jazz Joints: Capturing An Old Love Story
by Ian Patterson
Published: September 12, 2017
Read Misterioso What is Jazz? Misterioso
by Annette Johnson
Published: August 3, 2017
Read "Misterioso" What is Jazz? Misterioso
by Annette Johnson
Published: August 3, 2017
Read "Tokyo Jazz Joints: Capturing An Old Love Story" What is Jazz? Tokyo Jazz Joints: Capturing An Old Love Story
by Ian Patterson
Published: September 12, 2017
Read "In Praise of Young Jazz Musicians" What is Jazz? In Praise of Young Jazz Musicians
by Steve Provizer
Published: September 30, 2017
Read "The Many Faces of Jazz Today: The Big Picture" What is Jazz? The Many Faces of Jazz Today: The Big Picture
by Victor L. Schermer
Published: November 10, 2017
Read "Jazz and Philosophy" What is Jazz? Jazz and Philosophy
by Douglas Groothuis
Published: October 15, 2017

Join the staff. Writers Wanted!

Develop a column, write album reviews, cover live shows, or conduct interviews.

Please support out sponsor