Grand Union Orchestra: Music and Movement
Unashamedly opposed to racism, unashamedly internationalistGrand Union is a product of all of these peoples and their musics and, at its best, it transcends all of them. Long before the term "World Music" turned on a light in some record exec's brain, GUO Director and keyboardist Tony Haynes had seen his vision transformed into a remarkable vehicle for a fusion of forms and styles that remains quite unprecedented.
GUO's most recent CD, If Paradise (Red Gold, 2011), is arguably its finest to date and its most successful integration of content and form. Recorded in 2003, it tells a story of a young Asian couple caught up in contemporary events where imperialism and religious fundamentalism are no longer abstractions but touch all our lives for the far, far worse. In its text and its music, If Paradise does not shrink from confronting controversial issues. In fact, it questions "the moral certainties of all politicians and generals who tolerate, condone and often stir up conflict created by religious dogma and fundamentalism." Its case rests upon that potential of all human beings to transform their world, which is seen most powerfully in music and art.
If Paradise is both an amazing musical achievement, but also a very brave one.
"It doesn't seem like that to me," Haynes says. "I mean, it hasn't got a great deal of coverage. We shall probably do it again but I'm not sure when. One assumes, of course, that sadly it will remain relevant to what is happening in the world. Tell me, what is it about the recording you particularly liked?"
That is an easy one. It is one of the finest musical syntheses I've ever heard; it is coherent, consistent and that the performances are quite astonishing. More puzzled than frustrated by the absence of response elsewhere, Haynes replies, "Then how can I get it listened to in that light? Why is it that people aren't interested in covering something like this? I don't like the word 'message' because I don't think that's what we are involved in at all. We're expressing the world in which we live. I don't really understand why it doesn't seem to provoke more interest."
It sometimes seems that Grand Union's music is seen as "too jazz" for the world music audience and "too world" for the jazz audience. Is that part of the problem?
"Maybe," he answers. "And, of course, you have the lyrical content sung in several different languages, as well. Perhaps, it's hard for people to work out in what category it might belong."
One would think that diversity would be a strength. Haynes chuckles as he replies, "Exactly. But through my career, it's been a case of 'Lovely darling, but we can't sell this product because it doesn't fit anywhere.' So, when it comes to the shelves at HMV where are they going to locate it? Perhaps, if there were a category like the cleverly created 'world music' category, that wonderful catch-all category, or if there were a category called 'boundary-crossing' then people would be able to take on board what we do but there isn't [laughing]."
Yet we only have to go back to the eighties and nineties, when artists like saxophonists Courtney Pine and Andy Sheppard, and groups like The Jazz Warriors and Loose Tubes and others in Britain were being lauded by critics and fans for doing precisely that. Or think back to the sixties and how successful saxophonist Joe Harriott and composer John Mayer's Indo-Jazz fusion was. They even played rock festivals. Have we entered a period when such music is seen as too difficultby the mainstream media at least?
"I think that's right," Haynes suggests. " Loose Tubes and the Jazz Warriors were all contemporaneous with Grand Union. They were, oddly enough, strangely monochrome in comparisonLoose Tubes, apart from the occasional conga player, were white boys and the Warriors were entirely black boys, while we were very mixed and had quite a lot of women involved as well. Perhaps that was thought to be a step too far [laughing]. I don't think any of it was conscious."