By Mike Brannon
If you had to choose one living musician who has pioneered the current state
and
techniques of his instrument, championed jazz education and performed with
most of the current crop of established, contemporary jazz artists (Chick,
Metheny, Jarrett, Herbie) plus has 'discovered' and been instrumental in
bringing up new leaders in his own bands (Metheny, Makoto Ozone, Tommy Smith,
etc), that would be Gary Burton.
First heard on record at 17 on the now legendary Columbia recording with
country sessionist/bop guitarist Hank Garland, "Jazz Winds from a New
Direction", Burton's apparently not looked back as he's cut a path to
contemporary jazz through instinctively fusing the worlds of rock and jazz.
Along with others - Miles, Chick, Weather Report, McGlaughlin - who chose
their own methods and routes to this new sound, Burton was an originator of
what's become known as fusion. As with all these players, he continues to
return to the original jazz roots that started it all and 52 albums later
sounds as fresh and as inventive as ever.
MB - You were considered a prodigy growing up. As far as the 4 mallet
technique goes, I understand that growing up, and not having seen other
vibraphonists, you weren't aware that it wasn't being done. Are there times
when you use 6?
GB - No, I only use four, six becomes too clumsy and impractical, at least
from my experience. I started playing at age six, and started with four
mallets at about age eight, so it was a very natural thing for me.
MB - How were you first attracted to your instrument. Was it through drums
and percussion?
GB - Actually, I wasn't attracted to any particular instrument. I was six,
after all. My parents wanted us kids to take lessons of some kind, and since
my sister already played piano, they wanted something different for me. There
just happened to be a marimba/vibraphone teacher in the neighborhood, so
that's what I started with. And, it turned out to be a good match for my
abilities and concepts as things developed. I never had much interest in
percussion instruments otherwise. Never played drums.
MB - I know Bill Evans was a big influence on you. Who were your other
first influences, on vibes or otherwise, in Jazz and they changed?
GB - I always liked the great improvisers, great players of melody,
developers of themes. Sonny Rollins, Miles, Bill Evans, Cannonball, Coltrane,
were favorites. Also, Jim Hall, who was an influence on my comping style, as
well.
MB - Your first recording session was with Hank Garland and became the
legendary "Jazz Winds from a New Direction" - still a must have for jazz
guitarists and a place where you can hear some of the seeds of Pat's playing.
What was that experience and its fallout like for you? Did it seem like the
prodigal overnight success?
GB - At the time of "Jazz Winds," I don't think we realized it was destined
to be a major album and would influence so many guitarists. It was a modest,
though solid success at the time. Over the years, though, many guitarists,
including George Benson and Russell Malone, have told me that was the record
that got them inspired to play jazz guitar. The experience for me, at
seventeen to be playing this music and making a record was like a dream. It
all seemed to happen so quickly (two
evenings in a studio), and then it was over. I was really thrilled to get
an actual copy of it when it was released months later, and hold it in my
hands.
MB - I'm sure. Where does inspiration come from and is it difficult for you
to shift gears from Berklee duties, etc, and tap into it when you need new
material?
GB - The inspiration comes from the tunes you play, from the other
musicians you play with, and from your own imagination. I don't know exactly
how it works, just that it does, and you gradually learn how to fall into the
state of mind that allows you to play consistently. I don't find non-playing
activities to interfere with playing or being inspired. I seem to switch
gears from being "the player" to being the educator without much difficulty.
MB - How do you go about composing?
GB - I don't compose much, usually on a momentary inspiration. Some people
can really focus themselves and compose whole albums of material at a
sitting, and do this year after year. I have to wait till an idea pops up,
and then run with it. So, for me, it means a new tune every few years, not a
dozen new tunes every year.
MB - Can you discuss your experiences with meeting Metheny, his playing in
your band and subsequent gigs and sessions? Did you have any idea that he had
the potential he's shown?
GB - I met Pat the first time at a jazz festival in Wichita, he was playing
in a student band. He asked me to listen to his group, and I was impressed
with his playing. I advised him to move to a major city, New York, Boston,
etc. He showed up in Boston six months later. It was pretty obvious from the
beginning that he not only was going to be a major success (I didn't realize
how major), and a good businessman with his career. He's a real inspiration.
I'm incredibly proud of him.
MB - Is there anything unreleased upcoming w/ Pat or Towner?
GB - Nothing unreleased or planned at the moment. Pat and I seem to do
something every five years or so, so we've got a few years yet before the
next project. Haven't had much contact with Ralph since he moved to Italy at
the beginning of the 90's. But, he's a great guy, a great player, and a good
friend. Maybe sometime we'll do some more music together.
MB - You've worked with Scofield. Have you or will you work w/ other
guitarists such a Frisell or Stern?
GB - I was on one recording with Frisell, an Eberhard Weber record called
FLUID RUSTLE. Very interesting. Never played with Stern.
MB - You've been a part of what's come to be known as the ECM sound
(regardless of rec. label) with your work w/ Chick and your own group. How
would you describe that sound and what is it about it that didn't exist
before and does now?
GB - Manfred introduced two things to the jazz recording field. One was
better attention to sound quality which eventually inspired a lot of
improvement in all jazz recording, frankly. Secondly, he mixed American and
European musicians on projects and favored acoustic instruments and
introspective styles when the opposite was the dominant jazz of the moment. I
found Manfred a wonderful producer to work with. He had great ideas ("How
about you and Chick playing duo? You should do something with Ralph
Towner..."). And, he was an excellent sounding board for me
when I was in the middle of a session. Some people found him distracting,
but the choice of producer is always a very personal decision. I made some
great records during my sixteen years on the label.
MB - What do you expect of those you choose to use as sidemen and how was
that compared to what was expected of you as a sideman?
GB - expect a sideman to be well prepared on their instrument, with their
musical craft, with their personal behavior, and to be comfortable with the
personal dynamic of the band they are joining. On the other hand, if they
play just incredibly, I would pass on some of the above requirements, though
probably not all. I don't know what was expected of me as a sideman, but I
think I probably made a good impression. I worked very hard at doing my part
to make things work. And, I always tried to understand the vision of the
leader.
MB - Considering your vast abilities as a musician and improviser, you
choose to teach a music business class at Berklee. Why did you feel this was
so important at the time?
GB - It wasn't really my idea. So many students kept coming to me with
questions about business things, that it finally occurred to me that this
needed to be available as a course, so I started doing it. I enjoyed it
because I felt good about providing the students with the kind of information
that would help them manage their careers. This wasn't always easy to learn
about in earlier days in the business, and you generally learned by being
taken advantage of more than once or twice.
MB - I was fortunate enough to see you and Chick when you did the duo gigs
about 2 years ago (this was San Antonio at the Empire) and the interplay was
great. Was that apparent the first time you two played together and do you
find that to be the case w/ many others?
GB - The first experience Chick and I had playing together was when he
joined my band for about six months in 1968-69. We never seemed to be able to
jell. Seems funny now. So, we ended the experiment when there was a break
in the schedule, and soon after he joined Miles's band and I hired another
guitar player. A few years later, we played one duet tune at a jazz festival
as an encore, and Manfred Eicher insisted we should do a whole record as a
duo. WE thought it was insane, but finally agreed. In the studio in Norway,
we found we could play with almost amazing rapport as a duo. I don't know
why it was easier then, whether it was the instrumentation or just changes in
our playing in the interim years. Anyway, from that time on, whenever we have
played, it's been incredibly easy to interact and anticipate what each of us
is going to play. I've had good rapport with a variety of musicians over the
years, but with Chick, it has been pretty exceptional.
MB - That's pretty incredible. When and how did you start to think of the
Vibes as a lead instrument?
GB - From the beginning. Almost all vibists make it as leaders because few
bands normally have a vibes chair in the group. And, all my heros were
leaders, Milt, Hamp, Red, Cal, etc.
MB - You make use of guitar so much. What is it about the instrument that
you like... is it the comfortable blend w/ the timbre of the vibes?
GB - You're right. It's the sound and the blend of the two instruments
that seems to work so well.
MB - What is the current state of Jazz education from your perspective?
GB - It's a mixed bag. The good thing is that there is a lot of it. When I
was looking for a college as a high school student in the 50's, there was
only Berklee or North Texas. And, no high school jazz to speak of. Now, it's
practically everywhere, even if some of it isn't that great. I'm not in favor
of teaching jazz as a classical music. We need to be teaching people how to
be creative and individuals, and to see them as potentially the next
generation of jazz leaders, not as musicians
intended to recreate the past.
MB - What about the viability of Jazz as a profession for those getting
involved now or in the near future?
GB - The jazz profession is fine, frankly. This is always a glass half
empty or full issue. Ask any jazz musician how things are and they'll
respond based on their own gigging. If they're working steadily and their
band is hot, they'll say things are happening, man. If they're scuffling,
then they'll say the scene is dying, man. This has been the case from about
1960 on. When jazz ceased to be a dance music, it left the popular realm (to
be replaced by other dance music), and entered the
listening realm.....smaller, more serious audiences.
MB - What are your philosophies on: Being a musician.
GB - It's a great life if you play well enough.
MB - Improvisation.
GB - The most personal of musical expressions other than composing. And, it
isn't spontaneous composing any more than talking is literature.
MB - Spirituality as related to music and life as a musician
GB - I've never had any interest in spiritual pursuits. I've never bought
into the idea of a behind the scenes force manipulating what happens in
people's lives. I understand having a quiet moment to relax and clear the
head, I don't feel the need to give it a name, include a deity, or fire up
incense or chant.
MB - Listening.
GB - I rarely listen to records. Never during the four months or so process
of planning, recording, mixing of record projects. Otherwise, occasionally,
and always something far removed from my own music. Old jazz, classical,
tango.
The art of listening to the music around you when you're performing in an
ensemble: I try to lose myself into the motion and flow of sound in the
music, I try to imagine that I am playing all the instruments, not just my
own. I want to become the whole performance of the music. At first, young
musicians focus almost exclusively on their own playing and barely notice
other players. Over time, they should be able to give almost equal attention
to the other souonds in the ensemeble so they can
react and blend with the other players on an instinctive level rather than a
conscious level. This ability varies widely among even professional players.
Some are very good at hearing the interplay of the whole ensemble, others
remain mostly focused on their own playing.
MB - Very true; good points. What about touring?
GB - Used to love it, not so much now. I suppose that's normal. It's the
only way to stay in front of your audience since jazz folks are pretty much
spread all over the world.
MB - Teaching and its value and necessity.
GB - I'm a big believer in teaching. Learning by trial and error works, but
it's slow and tedious. Having a knowledgeable guide through the maze of
experiences not only speeds up the process but enhances it, too. Someone
once told me as a kid to beware of learning to read music. It would take away
my natural musical instincts. Can you imagine how dumb that would have been?
How many wonderful kinds of music I would have been denied if I hadn't
learned to read. People tend to assume way too much mystery about music and
musicians. Unfortunately, musicians tend to encourage this. After all, it
helps us promote our work.
MB - Some do, anyway. What is your current relationship to standards? Do
you have particular favorites and favorite (definitive) versions of them by
others?
GB - I like playing standards, though I don't play them all that much more
than originals. I grew up learning to play through playing standards, but
went through a long period when audiences weren't
interested in standards, so I learned to like original music a lot.
MB - Are there any plans to work with Herbie or Keith?
GB - None at the present time. I played with Herbie on a recording in 1964,
with Getz, on a Bob Brookmeyer record. Very nice experience. Played with
Keith, of course, in 1970, for several months of touring and a record project
which still sounds pretty good to me. But, no plans to do anything further
with either of them.
MB - Is there anyone in particular that you'd like to work with that you
haven't?
GB - Only one artist I really missed out on. I would have loved to do a
project with Sarah Vaughn, but it never happened. Otherwise, I can't say
there's anyone on my dance card that I'm still waiting for.
MB - Can you discuss your current projects...Like Minds (w/ Pat and Chick),
Libertango etc?
GB - Like Minds, was an all-star project first suggested by Pat who wanted
a chance to do a project with Chick. One of the most satisfying records I've
made. Everyone was terrific and the rapport was wonderful. Almost every tune
was a first take. Libertango is my third tango record featuring Astor
Piazzolla's wonderful compositions. My love of tango goes back about 35
years, and my playing experience with it began in 1985 when I toured for half
a year with Piazzolla and recorded the first project. I love tango, and
greatly enjoy the change from playing jazz. There's not much improvising for
me in tango, it's very passionate ensemble playing, and while I probably
wouldn't want to be exclusively a tango player, I love it when I get the
chance to spend some time with it.