HOME NEWS REVIEWS ARTICLES MUSICIANS SHOWS GUIDES PHOTOS FORUMS RADIO
Welcome Daily MP3s Videos Podcast Upcoming Releases Editorial Calendar Mobile Contests  
Advertise   |   Staff   |   AAJ Pro   |   Contact Us  












Column: Opinion
David X. Young

February 2001



Jazz Loft

Jazz Loft
Jazz Magnet
2000

Jazz Loft
Reviewed By

David R. Adler
Don Williamson


Buy It @
JazzSteps.com

Ken Burns It Up


By David X Young

Credentials; for ten years in a cheap loft in the flower district of Manhattan (I am a painter) I ran open jam sessions in a free party atmosphere until the early sixties, where some extraordinary musicians-- Chas. Mingus, Thelonius Monk, Jim Raney, Bob Brookmeyer, Teddy Charles, Jim Hall, Bill Evans. Dave Mckenna, Hall Overton, Gerry Mulligan, Bill Crow, Art Farmer, Jimmy Guiffre, Miles Davis, Paul Quinichette, Zoot Sims ---among many others--- came often to play. This lasted until roughly the death of JFK when jazz gigs became very few and the joyful spirit began to falter for a number of reasons. About this time Wynton Marsalis was born.

Nevertheless I wasn't one of the anointed jazz persons to receive a digital set of the PBS series pre-broadcast, so I had to watch the whole group of broadcasts in order to evaluate Burns' highly celebrated effort. That is endure, for I never felt that a music I have deeply loved and made part of my life for half a century could produce such joyless tedium.

Burns---after the Civil War thing--strikes me as a vastly overrated and pretentious filmmaker. His show on Frank Lloyd Wright was mostly gossip about his girlfriends. whereas barely known filmmaker Kenneth Love's FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT AND JAPANESE ART took you effortlessly right into the creative workings of Wright's mind. The difference is primarily that Burns has oceans of corporate cash behind him that hardly anyone else has. Here all that cash stifles the great free magic of jazz in the form of a commercial for the "Wynt-bag".

When beginning to watch I strongly doubted anything new would come from it. though one looked forward to enjoying an atmosphere in which I once daily bathed. Burns at best is--or his stooges are-- good photo researchers, and there were some nice visuals here and there. though choo-choo trains seemed to be going lickety split all over the place far too often. And some great goofs; a composite collage photo that W. Eugene Smith made of my jazzloft building--with silhouette cutouts of myself, musicians, groupies etc, all double-exposed for emphasis, is used to represent the action in Harlem about the time in the twenties when Duke Ellington arrived--- on one of those choo-choos. I guess that's a tribute of a sort, but I strongly doubt it was intended to be that.

There is also the nice surprise that the second jazz album cover I ever did, the first of the Modern Jazz Quartet, is shown (uncredited) in full color to suggest dope-free musicians, though I remember indulging at the time I made it. (It almost never got to be in color; Prestige honchos refused to pay for color plate separations so this one was printed in red ink on orange paper , and for which I received a begrudged fifty dollars). And I had never before seen a picture of Bix with a moustache. But it's all downhill from there.

Wynton Marsalis is roughly the Cheetah to Burns' Tarzan of this series, and Stanley Crouch its King Kong. It's their adventure, not ours, and we are forced along for the ride, propelled by a heavy oracular prose that squeezes all fun and juice out of the spirit and history of jazz--- as if it preceded Genesis itself. Come on, Wynton, Stanley, Ken and all the rest of you, smoke a joint for Chrissakes and let's get it on!

John Grabowski has done a priceless satire on the lingo of these guys which can't be bettered though it is certainly tempting. I might suggest instead of boom-chick we go to bang-chick for the origins of this music had much to do with sexual rambunction.

Jazz was originally-- for me-- a noise down the street; not for everybody. There was an association with Devils and secret good fun. And atop this---eventually-- came the realization that there was great wit and aesthetic value to the making of this music although that awareness was not really necessary to its pleasure--the 'art' did not come first.

Of course one venerates the genius of Louis, Lester, Bix, Bird, Duke-- all you need is ears and feet! But you don't need 'em relentlessly shoved down your throat over and over as well, especially by the noxious device of Cheetah talking over one of Louis' great solos, telling you how to listen to what you are already trying to hear.

When I hung out in the joints in the old days, smoking, drinking, schmoozing, dancing and groping lassies, the jazz was the perfect background and encouragement of the atmosphere, most congenial to the central nervous system and spirit of fun. If--as usually happened-- one of the players took a powerful solo that commanded our attention, the action of the whole room would stop in awe of its majesty and power of performance. The art came then, but the fun came first. It is the artist's job to command attention out of this cushion of pleasure.

The great Zoot Sims; "Every night for me is a party".

How much richer and truly wonderful this series could have been if the brilliant trumpeter Clark Terry, had been the major teaching voice, instead of the 20 seconds or so given him. He has it all, the talent, the knowledge, the history and a great sense of humor as well. Marsalis' and Crouch's scatting would be no match for this titan.

My good friend the late Jimmy Rowles' encyclopedic knowledge and experience is barely touched, let alone the fact he is one helluva bright and highly original pianist!

The fine talents ignored are legion. One of the most glaring is Woody Herman, who led two of the hippest and most original popular big bands of the forties at a time when Ellington was floundering. Woody kept a great many great musicians working over the years and deserves kudos for just that alone. Rowles could tell you a lot here--- most fascinating being the relationship of composer Igor Stravinsky to Woody and of his writing for the group. And of the truly great Burns, Ralph., the shy young man whose ingenious arrangements defined the persona of the band, as well as knocking Igor right on his ear with Bijou.

As the series grinds to a halt to feature baby pictures of Marsalis and add a random litany of allegedly promising young turks, the whole point seems to be towards GREAT ART and all the attendant pretensions. If the towering Sonny Rollins hadn't been woodshedding out on the Williamsburg bridge when he was, I doubt if Coltrane would have gained such portentous celebrity. Sonny could play rings around him, and always did. I don't get any religious vibe out of Coltrane's endless modal monotonies---but Bird, Lester, Louis, Sonny can give one great musical moments of spiritual and gut ecstasy.

I wish I could remember verbatim a comment made long ago by Fats Waller--- to the effect that, if you had to explain jazz, you would never really get it.

One night in Bradleys long ago, Frank Wess was trading very hip fours with the other musicians --all of wit and invention. It was great musical fun. Ron Carter turned to me and said "Do you have any idea how many players can't do that?"

Orson Welles put it brilliantly in his stage adaptation of MOBY DICK; " There is no such thing as an unemployed audience."


All material copyright © All About Jazz and/or contributing writer/visual artist. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy